In Colombia, significant pedagogical reforms throughout the late twentieth century reshaped the country’s educational landscape. These reforms influenced the way curriculum is perceived and designed, reflecting broader socio-political and cultural factors. The curriculum at Institución Educativa Distrital del Barrio Simón Bolívar (IED del Barrio Simón Bolívar) embodies these shifts, focusing on integrating the cultural, economic, philosophical, political, and social contexts of the community to foster holistic student development. This approach aims not only to equip students with academic knowledge but also to contribute to the formation of their cultural identity at local, regional, and national levels.
The school’s
curriculum design emphasizes the development of students' personal values,
cognitive and emotional skills, and moral principles. This aligns with a
pedagogical model that prioritizes human development through a social-critical
lens. By addressing real-life issues and engaging students with their social
values and political participation, the curriculum fosters critical thinking
aimed at transforming their immediate environment. The school sees itself as a
social agent capable of driving change and promoting the collective well-being
of the community.
Global and Local
Perspectives in the Educational Project
At IED del Barrio
Simón Bolívar, the curriculum is informed by both global educational frameworks
and local needs. The school's institutional educational project is guided by
the principles established by Colombia's Ministry of National Education, specifically
those outlined in Deborah Dezure's definition of curriculum:
"An undergraduate
curriculum is a formal academic plan for the learning experiences of students
in pursuit of a college degree... [It includes] goals for student learning,
content, sequence, learners, instructional methods, instructional resources, evaluation,
and adjustments to teaching and learning processes" (Dezure, n.d.).
This definition serves
as the foundation for IED del Barrio Simón Bolívar’s curricular framework,
which is designed to achieve specific goals by 2030. These goals focus on
improving the living conditions of vulnerable communities, implementing
institutional self-evaluation, refining pedagogical strategies, fostering
inclusion, and leveraging new educational trends to ensure quality education.
Curriculum
Objectives in Foreign Language Education
The English curriculum
at IED del Barrio Simón Bolívar is structured to develop linguistic
competencies, including listening, speaking, reading, and writing skills.
Additionally, students are encouraged to engage in various modes of
communication such as reception, production, mediation, and interaction. The
overarching goal is for students to express and understand information about
their reality in a foreign language, thereby positioning Colombia within the
global communication network, fostering cultural openness, and integrating into
the global economy.
This pedagogical
framework follows the social-critical approach, aiming to create a generation
of students capable of influencing their environment through critical
reflection and communication. The study of language in this context is not
merely a tool for communication but also a means of expanding knowledge and
understanding of one’s social and natural world. Thus, the study of English at
IED del Barrio Simón Bolívar is seen as a transformative process that involves
both linguistic and cultural education.
Pedagogical
Approach and Methodology
The English syllabus
incorporates theories of second language acquisition, the communicative
approach, and task-based language learning (TBL). However, despite the emphasis
on TBL, some teachers continue to apply the Presentation, Practice, and
Production (PPP) model, a more traditional approach to language teaching. This
discrepancy highlights a need for further professional development in TBL
methodology.
The syllabus also
outlines the importance of learning strategies, referencing Rebecca Oxford’s
(1990) work on language learning strategies and Prabhu's (1987) procedural
tasks, such as information-gap, opinion-gap, and reasoning-gap activities.
These strategies aim to facilitate communication and improve student engagement
by making learning more contextually relevant and interactive.
Resources and
Technological Integration
One of the challenges
facing IED del Barrio Simón Bolívar is the insufficient and deteriorated
resources for teaching. While the school is equipped with basic infrastructure,
including classrooms, computer labs, and audio-visual rooms, the resources available
for language teaching are often inadequate or inaccessible. At site one, for
example, there are 20 classrooms, two computer rooms, and an audiovisual room,
yet the resources are limited and in need of repair. Site two, meanwhile, is in
the process of adapting a classroom into a computer lab.
The integration of
technology into the teaching process, especially for foreign languages, is
recognized in the institutional educational project. However, there is a lack
of clear curricular guidance on how to incorporate emerging pedagogies and
technologies in English language instruction. This gap presents an opportunity
for the school to contextualize and integrate information and communication
technologies (ICT) into its language teaching strategies to promote cultural
exchange and reinforce the relevance of English in global contexts.
Evaluation and
Assessment
The school's approach
to evaluation focuses on both summative and formative assessments, as outlined
in the institutional educational project. Teachers assess students based on
cognitive, procedural, and attitudinal aspects, with self-assessment playing a
key role in developing student autonomy. While the assessment criteria are
comprehensive, there is a focus on preparing students for standardized tests,
such as the Saber Test, which limits the scope of assessment to academic
performance rather than comprehensive, holistic development.
A balanced approach to
assessment, considering both qualitative and quantitative aspects, is essential
for fostering a more inclusive and accurate evaluation of student progress.
Comprehensive assessment frameworks would better reflect the school’s commitment
to developing well-rounded citizens capable of transforming their communities.
Conclusion: A Path
Forward
To fulfill its role as
an agent of social change, IED del Barrio Simón Bolívar must continue to refine
its curriculum, ensuring that it aligns with the realities of students’ lives
while also fostering critical engagement with global issues. The school must
also reassess its pedagogical methodologies, integrating ICT and innovative
pedagogies to enhance English language learning. By doing so, it will better
prepare students to navigate the challenges of the globalized world while
remaining grounded in their local context.
Curricular Focus |
Key Elements |
Current Status |
Future Goals |
Pedagogical Approach |
Social-critical approach, communicative and
task-based methods |
Some teachers continue using PPP model |
Full implementation of task-based methodology |
Language Learning |
Develop listening, speaking, reading,
writing, mediation, interaction skills |
Focus on linguistic skills |
Incorporate cultural and social contexts more
deeply into teaching |
Resources |
Classroom infrastructure, computer labs,
audiovisual rooms |
Insufficient and deteriorated resources |
Improve and expand teaching resources and
access to ICT |
Assessment |
Cognitive, procedural, and attitudinal
assessment, self-assessment |
Focus on standardized tests |
More comprehensive assessment approaches for
holistic development |
References
Colombia. Ministerio
de Educación Nacional. (2021, April 2). Currículo. CURRÍCULO:
(mineducacion.gov.co)
Dezure, D. (n.d.).
Innovations in the undergraduate curriculum. State University of New York.
https://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/1896/Curriculum-Higher-Education.html#ixzz6dW5ak5YP
Oxford, R. (1990). Language
learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House
Publishers.
Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford University Press.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario
Me gustaría conocer tu opinión