Task 1
English is the
focus of language learning. Educators aim to comprehend the unconscious
processes through which learners develop their ability to use linguistic
structures and forms for effective communication in a second language. This
understanding allows teachers to analyze how students encode and decode
messages within specific contexts, influenced by cultural, economic, and social
circumstances that shape communicative situations. Pragmatic content and the
acquisition of sociolinguistic knowledge are essential elements in this
process. Learning activities and attitudes should be designed to promote the
development of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor skills. However, both
theoretical frameworks suggest that content often takes a subordinate role to
the priority of linguistic competence.
Content must be
relevant and meaningful to students. It should align with the principles of a
learner-centered curriculum. As Richards and Schmidt (2010) state,
"learning is dependent upon the nature and will of the learners" (p.
326). Nevertheless, teachers are often bound by curriculum constraints and must
adhere to a subject-centered approach, which sometimes limits their ability to
tailor content to students' needs.
Despite this
limitation, the content presented to students remains valuable. The teaching
and learning processes are closely linked to the sociocultural contexts in
which communicative events occur. This connection enriches students' cognitive
and mental schemata, allowing them to understand and navigate other
communicative codes. This broader understanding helps expand their
communicative abilities and knowledge. Language learnability is deeply rooted
in the learners' cognitive frameworks, facilitating the acquisition of a new
language.
Task 2
In the first
table, learning units are categorized based on their meanings and frequency of
use in particular communicative contexts, which enables students to demonstrate
their ability to use words effectively. This approach is grounded in the
theoretical framework proposed by Richards and Rodgers (1986), which supports
the communicative teaching of a language. The key principles include:
a. Language is a
system for expressing meaning. b. The primary function of language is
interaction and communication. c. The structure of language reflects its
functional and communicative uses. d. The primary units of language are not
limited to grammatical features but also include categories of functional and
communicative meaning as demonstrated in discourse.
In the second
table, content selection and grading are based on one of the earliest theories
of second language acquisition—behaviorism. This theory posits that individuals
learn a second language through imitation, practice, and reinforcement by
teachers or other adults. According to this perspective, students learn by
responding correctly to stimuli, with reinforcement (positive or negative)
guiding their progress. Behaviorists view language learning as a social
activity, emphasizing oral skills development. As such, students focus
initially on listening comprehension, stress, rhythm, and intonation patterns,
followed by speaking. This progression mimics first language acquisition.
However, students are often discouraged from speaking freely to avoid mistakes,
with immediate correction being emphasized to prevent the development of bad
habits.
Task 3
The methodology
promoted in this activity is based on audiolingualism, also known as the
audiolingual method. Richards and Rodgers (1986) reference American linguist
William Moulton, who articulated the linguistic principles that underpin this
language teaching approach: "Language is speech, not writing... A language
is a set of habits... Teach the language, not about the language... A language
is what its native speakers say, not what someone thinks they ought to say...
Languages are different" (quoted in Rivers, 1964, p. 5).
Consequently,
pronunciation and the drilling of basic sentence patterns receive systematic
attention in this method. The dialogues used in this activity incorporate
everyday expressions and fundamental structures, helping students understand
sound patterns and word combinations. These elements of language are learned
through mimicry and memorization, fostering auditory memory and the ability to
discriminate between different sounds.
Task 4
The objectives in
this lesson are outcome-based and specific. Students are required to understand
vocabulary related to days of the week, months of the year, time, dates,
numbers, and prices when describing events in their daily lives. These
objectives are observable and measurable, as students must use grammar
structures, everyday expressions, and basic phrases to communicate effectively.
The objectives are
attainable, as students are expected to acquire communicative competence,
enabling them to transfer their learning meaningfully and effectively through
speech acts when communicating in English. These outcomes are meaningful
because they empower students to interact in simple ways, provided the
conversation partner speaks slowly, clearly, and offers assistance when needed.
Task 5
This information-gap activity focuses on grammatical, functional, and lexical outcomes. It is designed to assess the achievement of a learning goal or outcome by the end of the course.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Richards, J.,
& Rodgers, T. (1986). Approaches
and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C.,
& Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman
dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4th ed.).
London: Longman.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario
Me gustaría conocer tu opinión